Basic Biology Question Time: Is It Possible For Women To Be A Healthy Promiscous Woman?

To definitively answer that question, is a woman biologically designed or hardwired to be promiscous

Are there any biological co-factors which support a womans ability to be promiscous?

A womans vagina is a massive breeding grounding for std’s, making it highly unsuitable & dangerous for sleeping with multiple men

Women have a highly short period of fertility. only 10 years of fertility, less if theyre in bad shape

Women have a limited amount of eggs

Plus women dont have the emotional blocking abilities of men

The real kicker is, women are only capable of having one mans child at a time

If women were meant to be polygamous, they’d be able to carry multiple children of multiple men

Making it ludicrous to assume women are polygamous, it’s laughably ridiculous to assume women are polygamous when theyre own biology isnt even capable of reproducing polygamously

Men on the other hand are designed from the ground up to impregnate millions of women, they reproduce over millions of sperm a day, & can impregnate 100’s of women

In fact one man, men are so efficient at reproducing with hundreds of women, one man could repopulate an entire civilisation if he wanted to, thanks to his production of millions of sperm

One woman on the other hand, couldnt populate her own ass, let alone a shoe box or a cat litter tray …

Proving a woman isnt anywhere near designed to be a slut, FACT

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Basic Biology Question Time: Is It Possible For Women To Be A Healthy Promiscous Woman?

  1. Women are absolutely polyamorous, or polygamous, or whatever word you’re using at the moment. Though they can only have one man’s baby at a time, they are built to put various mens’ sperm to compete for which guy gets to fertilize the egg. Hence, it is in their best interest to sleep around and collect lots of potential Alpha sperm during ovulation (which is why we know this is when they’re most likely to bang a bunch of dudes and cheat on their boyfriends).

    • Women arent optimised to be polygamous, which is the whole point

      A womans vagina is a highly sensitive environment, stuffing it full of cocks permanently destroys a vagina’s sterile environment, leading to dead children through still birth & massive amounts of autism & dyslexia

      How can you bond with your children, & present yourself as a moral upright woman, if you spend your life chasing cocks & permanently destroying your biology & mental health, something women are clearly designed not to do

      How can you state stuffing a vagina full of cocks & infecting millions of women with std’s & aids is beneficial to women in any shape or form?

      Also sleeping around with hundreds of men, greatly reduces a womans ability to find an alpha

      As women dont rely on their looks to find a man

      They rely on their biochemistry & pheromones, to get a man to bond with her

      A womans looks are the attractant, a womans pheromones gets a man to bond with her

      Sleeping around with hordes, greatly reduces a womans pheromones to bond with a man

      • Sleeping around leads to dyslexia and autism? You’re kidding, right? Find me some legitimate research that indicates such a connection.

        In my family’s case, dyslexia quite clearly runs in the family, at least through my maternal grandfather. My grandfather, mother, one aunt, two uncles, at least one cousin and I are all dyslexic. (I would estimate about 50% of my mothers family. The severity differs, and not every family member has been tested for learning difficulties, so it’s hard to be exact.)

        As someone with dyslexia I have read a lot about the subject. I can assure you, I have NEVER come across any research that indicates female promiscuity is at all related to dyslexia.

        As for the other hazards you list, they are universal. Last I checked men are just as guilty of spreading HIV and other STIs as women are. (More so if you consider the spread of HIV amongst gay men. Lesbian women are relatively HIV free oddly enough.) It should be obvious to everyone that, for the very reasons you list, NEITHER men NOR women should be promiscuous.

      • Can you cite references to back up your claims please? I as a person with medical qualification would like to know a little more particularly about the autism claims. Provide links.

  2. That being said, there is also a very high correlation between illness, mental illness, and the promiscuity of a given women. It is possible to be healthy and have many partners (I’ve known a few….ahem), and in fact they’re designed this way, but in our modern society where some women are racking up notch counts that put my own to shame, it doesn’t really work out so well for them.

  3. Honestly, your arguments are full of strawmen, putting words in my mouth, and angry Feminist-like ranting. I’m also not sure how you can call what you do “NLP” when you’re putting so much negativity out there. What’s the point of this article? To rant about why women should be more pure and chaste? Even if that were the case, I think you could make your points a lot better than Hamstering through a keyboard.

    • Prove they’re strawman arguements …

      By their very definition, quoting or stating a fact is a fact

      If you have facts which counter my statements, state them

      By their definition, you’re the one using strawman arguements, as your comment contains no solid facts, or reason

      Again please state clearly what it is you disagree with, as your comment is a victim of your own accusations lol

  4. Pingback: A Pickup Artist Asks the Question: “Is It Possible For Women To Be A Healthy Promiscous Woman?” | man boobz

  5. Okay, I’ve noticed quite a few problems with this article that you should address. Let us look over them, shall we?

    “A womans vagina is a massive breeding grounding for std’s, making it highly unsuitable & dangerous for sleeping with multiple men.”

    STDs are transmitted through mucous membranes. Both men and women have mucous membranes on and around their genitalia, so clearly both male genitalia and female genitalia are potentially “massive breeding ground for stds.” I would also like to point out that, presumably, these females get STDs from their male partners (just as men get STDs from their female partners). If both men and women were monogamous, there would be no spread of STDs. Based on this it becomes quite clear that, due to the possible spread of STDs, promiscuity is unhealthy for both men and women.

    “Women have a highly short period of fertility. only 10 years of fertility, less if theyre in bad shape”

    First, this is false. Women are fertile from their first period until menopause. A women’s first period generally happens around age 12 to 13, while menopause occurs around age 45 to 50. Let’s be generous and say one particular woman’s first period started at 15 and she then started menopause at age 40. That is still 25 years of fertility, more then half of your estimate. If you are concerned with birth defects, you should know those only become more prevalent around age 35 or later. If we limit women’s fertile years to between 15 and 35 that is still 20 years, double your estimate. Even if you up the minimum age to 18 to avoid statutory rape, that is still 17 years of fertility. I don’t know how you came up with the idea that healthy women are only fertile for a period of 10 years, but that is clearly false.

    Second, this statement is ultimately irrelevant to the point you are discussing. Why would a females limited fertility mean she should limit the number of partners she has sex with? If her chances of having a baby are so important to the biological urge, wouldn’t it make more sense for a woman to maximize the amount of sex she had? After all, the more often she has sex, the more likely she is to successfully fertilize one of her eggs. A woman’s fertility should then determine how often she has sex, not who she has sex with. The number of partners is meaningless to such a fertility based argument.

    “Women have a limited amount of eggs”

    Like your previous statement, this isn’t relevant to the point at hand. If a woman’s supply of eggs is limited, clearly she should have as much sex as possible to ensure as many of these eggs are fertilized as possible! Whether she should have this sex with one man or many is in no way influenced by her limited number of eggs.

    “Plus women dont have the emotional blocking abilities of men”

    Men don’t have emotional blocking abilities either. This is an example of “common sense” that is actually completely off the mark. There is a reason men are far more likely to have heart attacks, become dependent on drugs, commit suicide, etc. When feelings are bottled up instead of being expressed, it causes a great deal of psychological strain that is not good for the person. Men are socialized to hide their feelings, avoid attachment, and otherwise suppress emotion. This is harmful and is not a stereotype that should be perpetuated here or anywhere.

    “The real kicker is, women are only capable of having one mans child at a time. If women were meant to be polygamous, they’d be able to carry multiple children of multiple men”

    First, like your fertility statement, this is false. Look up the term heteropaternal superfecundation. A woman with a history of twins and triplets being born in her family actually has a good chance of have children by multiple fathers at the same time.

    Second, while the vast majority of pregnancies only involve one father, the fact remains that a woman can become pregnant multiple times. Just because her first child was fathered by a certain man doesn’t mean her second child also must be fathered by that same man. There might even be an evolutionary advantage to having a different father for every child! After all, what if the first father has some variety of genetic defect that prevents his children from having children of their own? The mother’s DNA would be prevented from passing on through any grandchildren due to said defect. But, if a second father comes into the picture that does not have such a defect, the mother’s DNA would be able to continue on down the line.

    If we actually think about it, based on the points both you and I have brought up, serial monogamy should clearly be evolutionarily selected for! A mother should have monogamous relations with a single man until she becomes pregnant (or has reason to believe he is infertile). Then, after her first child is born, she should find a different man to have monogamous relations with until she has a second child, and so on. If there is any deficiency in any of her partner’s genetic material, it will not affect the ability of her genetic information to be passed on.

    “Men on the other hand are designed from the ground up to impregnate millions of women, they reproduce over millions of sperm a day, & can impregnate 100′s of women.

    In fact one man, men are so efficient at reproducing with hundreds of women, one man could repopulate an entire civilisation if he wanted to, thanks to his production of millions of sperm.”

    First, this is completely irrelevant unless you are planning to colonize another planet by sending off 1 man and 99 women in a space ship with limited capacity. And even if you did have such a plan, I hope you would still send more then 1 man… Otherwise the next generation of colonists would be incapable of reproducing without incest being involved. I would suggest something like 33 men and 67 women. Your colony will last A LOT longer.

    Second, while men may produce a great deal of sperm, this does not mean they are intended to impregnate millions of women. In fact, it takes a lot more then one sperm to impregnate one woman in the first place! Sperm don’t exactly have egg detecting radar… When an egg is even present only a fraction of any injected sperm actually end up anywhere near it. Even the sperm that does ultimately find and penetrate the egg’s surface does not do so alone. It takes the enzyme release of many sperm to finally soften the egg’s membrane enough for one of them to successfully penetrate.

    The reason men must be able to produce so many sperm so often is actually quite simple. A woman can only become pregnant within a certain window of time. If men were similarly limited, it would be incredibly hard for anyone to have children. Partners would somehow have to pair up in a way that their cycles were actually synced; otherwise they would never both be fertile at the same time! It is far more convenient for one partner to always be ready to inject genetic material while the other partner does so in a controlled cycle. (The cycle is, of course, necessary since a woman’s body needs to do some preparation for a potential pregnancy. Would be mothers have got to build up a fresh uterine lining and all that.)

    “One woman on the other hand, couldnt populate her own ass, let alone a shoe box or a cat litter tray …”

    I hate to break it to you, but men can’t populate asses, shoe boxes or cat litter trays either. A woman’s uterus needs to be involved at some point.

    In conclusion, your only valid observations here demonstrate that BOTH men AND women should refrain from promiscuity. I’m also sad to inform you, but even if you can come up with more legitimate reasons for women to remain monogamous, they’re all still going to apply to men as well. Why? Easy. Men and women both make up approximately 50% of the world’s population. If women are all monogamous, all men must be monogamous too. (Either that or less then half of all men can be polygamists while the rest must be celibate. Or, I suppose, all men could be monogamous with respect to women but have promiscuous sex with other men.) If men were meant to be promiscuous and women monogamous, the ratio of women to men would be greater then 2 to 1. FACT.

  6. rmaxgenactivepua October 15, 2013 at 11:58 pm

    I completely agree with everything you’ve said here and correlates with my personal experiences in dealing with women; Women that have many cocks go through her tend to be mentally and physically unstable and unhealthy. And that is the way is has been for all humanity throughout history. When this modern society deviated from that, it is crumbling and society is messed up.

    • Yea, most definitely

      This is because women arent attracted to normal men

      Women have to be conditioned or certains conditions met, such as being dominated by strong men as teenage girls

      If they arent, women are naturally drawn to sociopaths & psychopaths

      Most women from the age of 14, literally spend most of their life whoring around with sociopaths & psychopaths, this is why most women are mentally unstable & so ruthless towards men

      Women arent attracted to normal men, unless theyre conditioned to … this is the main problem with women …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s